Tesla T4 vs Radeon HD 7550M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7550M with Tesla T4, including specs and performance data.

HD 7550M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 14 Watt
1.12

Tesla T4 outperforms HD 7550M by a whopping 2197% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1075219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.8626.93
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameThamesTU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)13 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802560
Core clock speed500 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speed550 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors716 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00254.4
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS8.141 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7550M 1.12
Tesla T4 25.73
+2197%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7550M 464
Tesla T4 10683
+2202%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Valorant 30−35
−2088%
700−750
+2088%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−2122%
600−650
+2122%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Dota 2 16−18
−2088%
350−400
+2088%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Valorant 30−35
−2088%
700−750
+2088%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Dota 2 16−18
−2088%
350−400
+2088%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Valorant 30−35
−2088%
700−750
+2088%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−2150%
270−280
+2150%
Valorant 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Valorant 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 25.73
Recency 7 January 2012 13 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 70 Watt

HD 7550M has 400% lower power consumption.

Tesla T4, on the other hand, has a 2197.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla T4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7550M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7550M is a notebook card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7550M
Radeon HD 7550M
NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 21 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 242 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7550M or Tesla T4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.