Tesla T4 vs Radeon HD 7530M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.17
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameThamesTU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)13 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4002560
Core clock speed450 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1590 MHz
Number of transistors716 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80254.4
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPS8.141 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2012 13 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 70 Watt

HD 7530M has 536.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla T4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7530M and Tesla T4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7530M is a notebook card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7530M
Radeon HD 7530M
NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 240 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7530M or Tesla T4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.