Radeon 780M vs HD 7520G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7520G with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

HD 7520G
2012
35 Watt
0.79

780M outperforms HD 7520G by a whopping 2120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1185338
Place by popularitynot in top-10059
Power efficiency1.5983.37
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameScrapperPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speed496 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed685 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.220139.2
Floating-point processing power0.263 TFLOPS8.909 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7520G 0.79
Radeon 780M 17.54
+2120%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7520G 313
Radeon 780M 6977
+2129%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7520G 559
Radeon 780M 12819
+2193%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7520G 2045
Radeon 780M 41650
+1937%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7520G 3185
Radeon 780M 48112
+1411%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−25%
35
+25%
1440p0−122
4K0−113

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1850%
39
+1850%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−5100%
52
+5100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1450%
31
+1450%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−4400%
45
+4400%
Far Cry 5 0−1 45
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−688%
60−65
+688%
Valorant 30−33
−343%
130−140
+343%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−929%
210−220
+929%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%
Dota 2 12−14
−685%
100−110
+685%
Far Cry 5 0−1 41
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−688%
60−65
+688%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−667%
46
+667%
Valorant 30−33
−343%
130−140
+343%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1050%
23
+1050%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%
Dota 2 12−14
−685%
100−110
+685%
Far Cry 5 0−1 39
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−688%
60−65
+688%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−383%
29
+383%
Valorant 30−33
−343%
130−140
+343%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−4067%
120−130
+4067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−3925%
160−170
+3925%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 16
Dead Island 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1900%
20
+1900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−31.3%
21
+31.3%
Valorant 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 119
+0%
119
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65
+0%
65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how HD 7520G and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 25% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dead Island 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Radeon 780M is 5100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is ahead in 35 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 17.54
Recency 6 June 2012 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 2120.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7520G is a notebook card while Radeon 780M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7520G
Radeon HD 7520G
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 103 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1965 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7520G or Radeon 780M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.