UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) vs Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1004 | 892 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.58 |
| Architecture | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | no data | Lakefield GT2 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 28 May 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 736 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 655 / 600 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 7 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR4 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 23
−30.4%
| 30−35
+30.4%
|
| Full HD | 17
+30.8%
| 13
−30.8%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−20%
|
40−45
+20%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 44
−4.5%
|
45−50
+4.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+26.7%
|
15
−26.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−20%
|
40−45
+20%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+26.7%
|
15
−26.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−20%
|
40−45
+20%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−70%
|
16−18
+70%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−150%
|
20−22
+150%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 30% faster in 900p
- HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 31% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 27% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics performs better in 2 tests (4%)
- UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) performs better in 48 tests (87%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.52 | 2.31 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 28 May 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has a 52% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
