Radeon HD 2600 XT vs HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Place in performance ranking	918	1131
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	no data	RV630
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)	28 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	736	120
Core clock speed	655 / 600 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	390 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	6.400
Floating-point performance	no data	192 gflops
Floating-point performance	no data	0.192 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model	no data	4.0
OpenGL	no data	3.3
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	23 +130%	10−12 −130%
Full HD	18 +125%	8−9 −125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+300%

1−2

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +143%	14−16 −143%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+200%

1−2

−200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+300%

1−2

−300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+200%

1−2

−200%

This is how HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and ATI HD 2600 XT compete in popular games:

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 130% faster in 900p
HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 125% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.62	0.73
Recency	15 May 2012	28 June 2007
Chip lithography	40 nm	65 nm

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics has a 121.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while Radeon HD 2600 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.