GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
1.53

GTX 1650 outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 1128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking987309
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.05
Power efficiencyno data19.09
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores736896
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data93.24
Floating-point processing powerno data2.984 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 1.53
GTX 1650 18.79
+1128%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 1621
GTX 1650 13759
+749%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 3755
GTX 1650 47363
+1161%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−1117%
280−290
+1117%
Full HD17
−276%
64
+276%
1440p3−4
−1167%
38
+1167%
4K1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.33
1440pno data3.92
4Kno data6.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
God of War 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1625%
69
+1625%
Fortnite 5−6
−4120%
211
+4120%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−900%
90
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−3550%
73
+3550%
God of War 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−800%
90
+800%
Valorant 35−40
−734%
292
+734%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1667%
53
+1667%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 100−110
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 44
−425%
230−240
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Dota 2 18−20
−411%
97
+411%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1475%
63
+1475%
Fortnite 5−6
−1600%
85
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−822%
83
+822%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−3000%
62
+3000%
God of War 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−3950%
81
+3950%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1650%
35
+1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−760%
86
+760%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−914%
71
+914%
Valorant 35−40
−643%
260
+643%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1600%
51
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Dota 2 18−20
−384%
92
+384%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−622%
65
+622%
God of War 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−560%
66
+560%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−486%
41
+486%
Valorant 35−40
−100%
70
+100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1120%
61
+1120%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−1290%
130−140
+1290%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−969%
170−180
+969%
Valorant 8−9
−2113%
177
+2113%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 18−20
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1050%
46
+1050%
God of War 0−1 21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−120%
33
+120%
Valorant 8−9
−938%
83
+938%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
God of War 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1200%
26
+1200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
11
+450%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 40
+0%
40
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%

This is how HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 1117% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1650 is 276% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 1167% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 2300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 is 4120% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 49 tests (82%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 18.79
Recency 15 May 2012 23 April 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 has a 1128.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 21 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 26399 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics or GeForce GTX 1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.