GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon HD 7570M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7570M with GeForce GTX 1650, including specs and performance data.

HD 7570M
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 13 Watt
1.11

GTX 1650 outperforms HD 7570M by a whopping 1742% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1091279
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.82
Power efficiency5.8718.74
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameThamesTU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480896
Core clock speed500 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors716 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0093.24
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7570M 1.11
GTX 1650 20.45
+1742%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7570M 427
GTX 1650 7880
+1745%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7570M 829
GTX 1650 13645
+1546%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7570M 3727
GTX 1650 44694
+1099%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7570M 569
GTX 1650 9203
+1517%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7570M 4623
GTX 1650 50549
+993%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14
−1686%
250−260
+1686%
Full HD22
−214%
69
+214%
1440p2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%
4K1−2
−2400%
25
+2400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.16
1440pno data3.63
4Kno data5.96

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Atomic Heart 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%
Battlefield 5 0−1 61
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Fortnite 2−3
−10450%
211
+10450%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1400%
90
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−900%
90
+900%
Valorant 30−35
−813%
292
+813%
Atomic Heart 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%
Battlefield 5 0−1 53
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−824%
230−240
+824%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Dota 2 14−16
−547%
97
+547%
Fortnite 2−3
−4150%
85
+4150%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1283%
83
+1283%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3400%
35
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−856%
86
+856%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1320%
71
+1320%
Valorant 30−35
−713%
260
+713%
Battlefield 5 0−1 51
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Dota 2 14−16
−513%
92
+513%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−983%
65
+983%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−633%
66
+633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−720%
41
+720%
Valorant 30−35
−119%
70
+119%
Fortnite 2−3
−2950%
61
+2950%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−2217%
130−140
+2217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2767%
170−180
+2767%
Valorant 2−3
−8750%
177
+8750%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2200%
46
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1450%
31
+1450%
Fortnite 2−3
−2000%
42
+2000%
Atomic Heart 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−120%
33
+120%
Valorant 6−7
−1283%
83
+1283%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Dota 2 0−1 59
Far Cry 5 2−3
−850%
19
+850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1200%
26
+1200%
Fortnite 2−3
−450%
11
+450%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Far Cry 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+0%
81
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+0%
40
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%
Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how HD 7570M and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 1686% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1650 is 214% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 1950% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 2400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 is 10450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 44 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.11 20.45
Recency 7 January 2012 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 75 Watt

HD 7570M has 476.9% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has a 1742.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7570M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7570M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7570M
Radeon HD 7570M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
105 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8
24735 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7570M or GeForce GTX 1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.