FirePro M4100 vs Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with FirePro M4100, including specs and performance data.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
1.67

M4100 outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking946803
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameno dataMars
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)16 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores736384
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz670 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data16.08
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5146 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 1.67
FirePro M4100 2.76
+65.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 1621
FirePro M4100 1728
+6.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Full HD16
+60%
10
−60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Elden Ring 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Dota 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Elden Ring 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Fortnite 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
World of Tanks 44
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Dota 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 0−1 2−3
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
World of Tanks 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 0−1 1−2
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Valorant 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1

This is how HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and FirePro M4100 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro M4100 is 52% faster in 900p
  • HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 60% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the FirePro M4100 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • FirePro M4100 is ahead in 41 test (73%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 2.76
Recency 15 May 2012 16 October 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

FirePro M4100 has a 65.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro M4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M4100 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
AMD FirePro M4100
FirePro M4100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 20 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate FirePro M4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.