GeForce 7300 SE vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with GeForce 7300 SE, including specs and performance data.

HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
1.59
+1490%

HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics outperforms 7300 SE by a whopping 1490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9591455
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameno dataG72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)22 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores736no data
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data112 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.800
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz266 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.256 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+1600%
4−5
−1600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
World of Tanks 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 10−11 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 7−8 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Valorant 2−3 0−1

This is how HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and 7300 SE compete in popular games:

  • HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 1600% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 0.10
Recency 15 May 2012 22 March 2006
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm

HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics has a 1490% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7300 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while GeForce 7300 SE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE
GeForce 7300 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 31 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7640G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 21 vote

Rate GeForce 7300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.