Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics by a whopping 753% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1120 | 495 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) | Xe LPG (2023) |
| GPU code name | no data | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 736 | 4 |
| Core clock speed | 655 / 600 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1950 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12_2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 2−3
−1150%
| 25
+1150%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−183%
|
16−18
+183%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−1450%
|
30−35
+1450%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−614%
|
50
+614%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−2800%
|
27−30
+2800%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−183%
|
16−18
+183%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−289%
|
35−40
+289%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−188%
|
90−95
+188%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 27−30
−752%
|
230−240
+752%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−700%
|
120−130
+700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−1100%
|
24
+1100%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−2800%
|
55−60
+2800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−457%
|
39
+457%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−2800%
|
27−30
+2800%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−183%
|
16−18
+183%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−289%
|
35−40
+289%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−317%
|
24−27
+317%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−188%
|
90−95
+188%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−700%
|
120−130
+700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−1450%
|
30−35
+1450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−329%
|
30
+329%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−183%
|
16−18
+183%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−289%
|
35−40
+289%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−733%
|
50−55
+733%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−188%
|
90−95
+188%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−650%
|
30−33
+650%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 7−8
−943%
|
70−75
+943%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−327%
|
45−50
+327%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−1900%
|
20−22
+1900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−667%
|
21−24
+667%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−550%
|
12−14
+550%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−42.9%
|
20−22
+42.9%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−733%
|
50−55
+733%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
This is how HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 1150% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) performs better in 31 tests (54%)
- there's a draw in 26 tests (46%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.05 | 8.96 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 14 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 753.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
