Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics vs Arc 8-Core iGPU
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU and Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8-Core iGPU outperforms HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics by a whopping 1424% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 354 | 1120 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 15 May 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 736 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 655 / 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2300 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1800 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 11 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 35
+1650%
| 2−3
−1650%
|
| 1440p | 17
+1600%
| 1−2
−1600%
|
| 4K | 14 | 0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 111
+1486%
|
7−8
−1486%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+433%
|
6−7
−433%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85
+1600%
|
5−6
−1600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 39
+1850%
|
2−3
−1850%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+4600%
|
2−3
−4600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+900%
|
7−8
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 26
+333%
|
6−7
−333%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+622%
|
9−10
−622%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+322%
|
30−35
−322%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 42
+2000%
|
2−3
−2000%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
+704%
|
27−30
−704%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 36
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
+4600%
|
2−3
−4600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+900%
|
7−8
−900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+5300%
|
1−2
−5300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 25
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 19
+217%
|
6−7
−217%
|
| Metro Exodus | 28
+1300%
|
2−3
−1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+622%
|
9−10
−622%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 48
+700%
|
6−7
−700%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+322%
|
30−35
−322%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 34
+1600%
|
2−3
−1600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+900%
|
7−8
−900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16
+167%
|
6−7
−167%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+622%
|
9−10
−622%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
+300%
|
6−7
−300%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+322%
|
30−35
−322%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 90−95
+4600%
|
2−3
−4600%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+750%
|
4−5
−750%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+1700%
|
7−8
−1700%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 11 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+1391%
|
10−12
−1391%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+8250%
|
2−3
−8250%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+1533%
|
3−4
−1533%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 32
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1300%
|
3−4
−1300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+2500%
|
1−2
−2500%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
+1850%
|
2−3
−1850%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9
−66.7%
|
14−16
+66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+2400%
|
1−2
−2400%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+1517%
|
6−7
−1517%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+2500%
|
1−2
−2500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+2900%
|
1−2
−2900%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 16−18
+750%
|
2−3
−750%
|
Full HD
High
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 1650% faster in 1080p
- Arc 8-Core iGPU is 1600% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 8-Core iGPU is 8250% faster.
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is 67% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc 8-Core iGPU performs better in 41 tests (93%)
- HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics performs better in 1 test (2%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.00 | 1.05 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 15 May 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 40 nm |
Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 1423.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
