GeForce Go 6200 TE vs Radeon HD 7480D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1164not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteNV43 A4
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)29 September 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed723 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate6.4001.200
Floating-point processing power0.2048 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 29 September 2005
Chip lithography 32 nm 110 nm

HD 7480D has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7480D and GeForce Go 6200 TE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7480D is a desktop card while GeForce Go 6200 TE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Radeon HD 7480D
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 TE
GeForce Go 6200 TE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 266 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7480D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate GeForce Go 6200 TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.