GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon HD 6990

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6990 with GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 6990
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 375 Watt
7.11

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile outperforms HD 6990 by a whopping 700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking56541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.47no data
Power efficiency1.4472.23
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAntillesGB205
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 March 2011 (14 years ago)March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536 ×25888
Core clock speed830 MHz847 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1447 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate79.68 ×2266.2
Floating-point processing power2.55 TFLOPS ×217.04 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×280
TMUs96 ×2184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length295 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×212 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s ×2672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6990 7.11
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 56.89
+700%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6990 3013
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 24099
+700%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6990 5830
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 44604
+665%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−719%
131
+719%
1440p10−12
−750%
85
+750%
4K7−8
−771%
61
+771%

Cost per frame, $

1080p43.69no data
1440p69.90no data
4K99.86no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 316
+0%
316
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 244
+0%
244
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 164
+0%
164
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+0%
154
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 174
+0%
174
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how HD 6990 and RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 719% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 750% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is 771% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 36 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.11 56.89
Recency 8 March 2011 on March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 700.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6990 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6990
Radeon HD 6990
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 28 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 143 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6990 or GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.