UHD Graphics vs Radeon HD 6970M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970M and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6970M
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.91
+5.5%

HD 6970M outperforms UHD Graphics by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking593608
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Power efficiency5.4338.60
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameBlackcombJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960256
Core clock speed680 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate32.6412.00
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970M 5.91
+5.5%
UHD Graphics 5.60

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6970M 2270
+5.5%
UHD Graphics 2151

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p52
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Full HD50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Elden Ring 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Valorant 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Dota 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Elden Ring 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Fortnite 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Valorant 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
World of Tanks 90−95
+10.6%
85−90
−10.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Dota 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Valorant 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Elden Ring 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
World of Tanks 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Valorant 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Elden Ring 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Fortnite 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how HD 6970M and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • HD 6970M is 16% faster in 900p
  • HD 6970M is 11% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.91 5.60
Recency 4 January 2011 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 10 Watt

HD 6970M has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 6970M and UHD Graphics.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Radeon HD 6970M
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 92 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6788 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.