Radeon RX Vega M vs HD 6970

Place in performance ranking	533	318
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.00	no data
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	Cayman	Vega
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	14 December 2010 (13 years ago)	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$369	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	512
Core clock speed	no data	720 MHz
Boost clock speed	880 MHz	1190 MHz
Number of transistors	2,640 million	4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	550 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	84.48	38.08
Floating-point performance	2.703 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	IGP
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	System Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	no data
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	12.0
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970 7.34

RX Vega M 17.04
+132%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6970 2831

RX Vega M 6573
+132%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−125%

27−30
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Hitman 3	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −121%	95−100 +121%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −125%	45−50 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −122%	120−130 +122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Hitman 3	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −121%	95−100 +121%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −125%	45−50 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −122%	120−130 +122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −110%	21−24 +110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −124%	110−120 +124%
Hitman 3	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −121%	95−100 +121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −127%	50−55 +127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −122%	120−130 +122%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22

−125%

45−50
+125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −114%	30−33 +114%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −122%	60−65 +122%
Hitman 3	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −113%	100−105 +113%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−131%

30−33
+131%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Hitman 3	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−129%

16−18

+129%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.34	17.04
Recency	14 December 2010	1 February 2018
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	550 Watt	15 Watt

RX Vega M has a 132.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 3566.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6970 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.