Radeon RX Vega M vs HD 6870 1600SP Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data80.18
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCypressVega
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 January 2013 (12 years ago)1 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600512
Core clock speed850 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate68.0038.08
Floating-point processing power2.72 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs8032
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length282 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1050 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth134.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 January 2013 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition or Radeon RX Vega M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.