GeForce MX250 vs Radeon HD 6970

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

HD 6970
2010
2048 MB DDR5
7.32
+16.9%

Radeon HD 6970 outperforms GeForce MX250 by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking502543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.052.38
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameCaymanN17S-G2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (13 years old)20 February 2019 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$369 no data
Current price$189 (0.5x MSRP)$1165
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce MX250 has 127% better value for money than HD 6970.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536384
Core clock speedno data1518 MHz
Boost clock speed880 MHz1582 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)550 Watt10/25 Watt
Texture fill rate84.4824.91
Floating-point performance2,703.4 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6970 and GeForce MX250 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48.06 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkanno data1.2
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6970 7.32
+16.9%
GeForce MX250 6.26

Radeon HD 6970 outperforms GeForce MX250 by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 6970 2836
+17%
GeForce MX250 2423

Radeon HD 6970 outperforms GeForce MX250 by 17% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 6970 3470
GeForce MX250 3660
+5.5%

GeForce MX250 outperforms Radeon HD 6970 by 5% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
+4.3%
23
−4.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−26.7%
19
+26.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−30%
13
+30%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−9.5%
23
+9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+9.1%
11
−9.1%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−11.8%
19
+11.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−16.7%
21
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−24%
31
+24%
Hitman 3 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+7.7%
13
−7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−7.7%
14
+7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−12.5%
18
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+15.4%
13
−15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+26.3%
19
−26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+31.3%
16
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+4.2%
24
−4.2%
Hitman 3 18−20
+157%
7
−157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+133%
6
−133%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+57.1%
7
−57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+62.5%
8
−62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+45.5%
11
−45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−40%
21
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+114%
7
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+71.4%
14
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+5.9%
17
−5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+56.3%
16
−56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+25%
12
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how HD 6970 and GeForce MX250 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • HD 6970 is 4.3% faster than GeForce MX250

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 6970 is 157% faster than the GeForce MX250.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX250 is 40% faster than the HD 6970.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6970 is ahead in 50 tests (75%)
  • GeForce MX250 is ahead in 10 tests (15%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (10%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 7.32 6.26
Recency 14 December 2010 20 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 550 Watt 10 Watt

The Radeon HD 6970 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6970 is a desktop card while GeForce MX250 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970
Radeon HD 6970
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GeForce MX250

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 149 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 6970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1455 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.