T400 vs Radeon HD 6950M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6950M with T400, including specs and performance data.

HD 6950M
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.57

T400 outperforms HD 6950M by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking721471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.8921.47
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBlackcombTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960384
Core clock speed580 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate27.8434.20
Floating-point processing power1.114 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs4824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Hitman 3 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Hitman 3 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Hitman 3 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.57 9.40
Recency 4 January 2011 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 30 Watt

T400 has a 163.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6950M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6950M is a notebook card while T400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6950M
Radeon HD 6950M
NVIDIA T400
T400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 381 vote

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.