Quadro4 100 NVS PCI vs Radeon HD 6930

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking537not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.13no data
Power efficiency2.73no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameCaymanNV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)22 December 2003 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed750 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)186 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate60.001.000
Floating-point processing power1.92 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length220 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 22 December 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 186 Watt 10 Watt

HD 6930 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 100 NVS PCI, on the other hand, has 1760% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6930 and Quadro4 100 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6930 is a desktop card while Quadro4 100 NVS PCI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6930
Radeon HD 6930
NVIDIA Quadro4 100 NVS PCI
Quadro4 100 NVS PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 65 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 100 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.