A100 PCIe vs Radeon HD 6930

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking599not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.90no data
Power efficiency2.79no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCaymanGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 December 2011 (14 years ago)22 June 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12806912
Core clock speed750 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)186 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate60.00609.1
Floating-point processing power1.92 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs80432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache320 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length220 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB40 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 22 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 186 Watt 250 Watt

HD 6930 has 34.4% lower power consumption.

A100 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6930 and A100 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6930 is a desktop graphics card while A100 PCIe is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6930
Radeon HD 6930
NVIDIA A100 PCIe
A100 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 67 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 55 votes

Rate A100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6930 or A100 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.