Radeon HD 6250 IGP vs A100 PCIe

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGA100Loveland
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 June 2020 (5 years ago)9 November 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691280
Core clock speed1410 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million450 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rate609.13.200
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS0.064 TFLOPS
ROPs1604
TMUs4328
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache40 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount40 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width5120 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 June 2020 9 November 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 9 Watt

A100 PCIe has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6250 IGP, on the other hand, has 2677.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 PCIe and Radeon HD 6250 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 PCIe is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 6250 IGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 PCIe
A100 PCIe
AMD Radeon HD 6250 IGP
Radeon HD 6250 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 55 votes

Rate A100 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6250 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 PCIe or Radeon HD 6250 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.