Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs HD 6870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6870 with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

HD 6870
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
5.74
+21.1%

HD 6870 outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking564612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.372.97
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameRV940 BartsPolaris 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date22 October 2010 (13 years ago)21 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$239 $149
Current price$332 (1.4x MSRP)$343 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO WX 2100 has 703% better value for money than HD 6870.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1120512
Boost clock speed900 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate50.4039.01
Floating-point performance2,016.0 gflops1,248 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6870 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length220 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.4 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSyncno data+
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkanno data1.2.131
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6870 5.74
+21.1%
PRO WX 2100 4.74

HD 6870 outperforms PRO WX 2100 by 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 6870 2218
+21.2%
PRO WX 2100 1830

HD 6870 outperforms PRO WX 2100 by 21% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p57
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
Full HD66
+32%
50−55
−32%
1200p39
+30%
30−35
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Hitman 3 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

This is how HD 6870 and PRO WX 2100 compete in popular games:

  • HD 6870 is 27% faster in 900p
  • HD 6870 is 32% faster in 1080p
  • HD 6870 is 30% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6870 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6870 is ahead in 65 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.74 4.74
Recency 22 October 2010 21 March 2018
Cost $239 $149
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 50 Watt

The Radeon HD 6870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6870 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6870
Radeon HD 6870
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 329 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 36 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.