Radeon RX 6750 XT vs HD 6850M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6850M with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 6850M
2011
1 GB GDDR3, 50 Watt
2.03

RX 6750 XT outperforms HD 6850M by a whopping 2546% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking89251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.96
Power efficiency2.8014.83
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGranvilleNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8002560
Core clock speed675 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate27.00416.0
Floating-point processing power1.08 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6850M 2.03
RX 6750 XT 53.72
+2546%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6850M 1470
RX 6750 XT 48327
+3189%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6850M 6246
RX 6750 XT 104004
+1565%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p20
−2400%
500−550
+2400%
Full HD26
−538%
166
+538%
1440p3−4
−2767%
86
+2767%
4K1−2
−4800%
49
+4800%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.31
1440pno data6.38
4Kno data11.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−4800%
245
+4800%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1975%
166
+1975%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4025%
165
+4025%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−3420%
176
+3420%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−2940%
150−160
+2940%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1525%
130
+1525%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3075%
127
+3075%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−8800%
178
+8800%
Fortnite 8−9
−2600%
210−220
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−1820%
190−200
+1820%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−10750%
217
+10750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
Valorant 35−40
−605%
270−280
+605%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−1980%
104
+1980%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−2940%
150−160
+2940%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1263%
109
+1263%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−613%
270−280
+613%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2625%
109
+2625%
Dota 2 21−24
−633%
154
+633%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−8400%
170
+8400%
Fortnite 8−9
−2600%
210−220
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−1820%
190−200
+1820%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−9200%
186
+9200%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−3950%
162
+3950%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4133%
127
+4133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3400%
245
+3400%
Valorant 35−40
−605%
270−280
+605%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−2940%
150−160
+2940%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1100%
96
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2350%
98
+2350%
Dota 2 21−24
−524%
131
+524%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−7800%
158
+7800%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−1820%
190−200
+1820%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1829%
135
+1829%
Valorant 35−40
−605%
270−280
+605%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−2600%
210−220
+2600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2592%
350−400
+2592%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 106
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1246%
170−180
+1246%
Valorant 14−16
−2093%
300−350
+2093%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5900%
60
+5900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4600%
141
+4600%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2980%
150−160
+2980%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3367%
100−110
+3367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−4500%
130−140
+4500%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−593%
104
+593%
Valorant 10−11
−2830%
290−300
+2830%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 26
Dota 2 4−5
−2425%
101
+2425%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 100−110
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2300%
70−75
+2300%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%

This is how HD 6850M and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 2400% faster in 900p
  • RX 6750 XT is 538% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 2767% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 4800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 10750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is ahead in 54 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 53.72
Recency 4 January 2011 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt

HD 6850M has 400% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 2546.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6850M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6850M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6850M
Radeon HD 6850M
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6850M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2704 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6850M or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.