GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon HD 6750M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6750M and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6750M
2011
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
2.12

3050 Mobile outperforms HD 6750M by a whopping 873% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking899287
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Power efficiency4.8922.19
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameWhistlerGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)11 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4802048
Core clock speed600 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1057 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4067.65
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache48 KB2 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6750M 2.12
RTX 3050 Mobile 20.63
+873%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6750M 937
Samples: 12
RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
+874%
Samples: 2

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6750M 1159
RTX 3050 Mobile 21358
+1744%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6750M 5483
RTX 3050 Mobile 77234
+1309%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p21
−852%
200−210
+852%
Full HD24
−288%
93
+288%
1440p5−6
−920%
51
+920%
4K3−4
−967%
32
+967%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2420%
120−130
+2420%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2020%
106
+2020%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−1143%
87
+1143%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2420%
120−130
+2420%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1560%
83
+1560%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1867%
118
+1867%
Fortnite 10−12
−918%
110−120
+918%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−2060%
108
+2060%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−857%
67
+857%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−617%
85−90
+617%
Valorant 40−45
−285%
150−160
+285%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2420%
120−130
+2420%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−451%
240−250
+451%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1120%
61
+1120%
Dota 2 24−27
−604%
169
+604%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1683%
107
+1683%
Fortnite 10−12
−918%
110−120
+918%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1780%
94
+1780%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−2460%
128
+2460%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−657%
53
+657%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1450%
62
+1450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−617%
85−90
+617%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1767%
168
+1767%
Valorant 40−45
−285%
150−160
+285%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1120%
61
+1120%
Dota 2 24−27
−546%
155
+546%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1550%
99
+1550%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−500%
42
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−617%
85−90
+617%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−622%
65
+622%
Valorant 40−45
−285%
150−160
+285%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
−918%
110−120
+918%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−894%
150−160
+894%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−5600%
57
+5600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−729%
170−180
+729%
Valorant 18−20
−983%
190−200
+983%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2167%
68
+2167%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−833%
55−60
+833%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−1350%
29
+1350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1100%
35−40
+1100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−1225%
50−55
+1225%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−280%
57
+280%
Valorant 10−12
−1073%
120−130
+1073%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 12
Dota 2 5−6
−1760%
93
+1760%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3400%
35
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

1440p
High

Metro Exodus 36
+0%
36
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 15
+0%
15
+0%

This is how HD 6750M and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 852% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 288% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 920% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 967% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 5600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile performs better in 56 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.12 20.63
Recency 4 January 2011 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

HD 6750M has 114.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 873.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6750M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Radeon HD 6750M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 60 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 5287 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6750M or GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.