ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 vs HD 6750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6750 6770 6770 Green Edition 5670 640SP Edition 5750 5770 5770 Mac Edition 5770 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6750 with Mobility Radeon HD 5870, including specs and performance data.

HD 6750
2011, $50
2 GB GDDR5, 86 Watt
2.48

Mobility HD 5870 outperforms HD 6750 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 6750 HD 6750
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Mobility HD 5870

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking879852
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.224.22
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameJuniperBroadway
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date21 January 2011 (15 years ago)7 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores720800
Core clock speedno data700 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,040 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate25.2028.00
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPS1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3640
L1 Cache72 KB80 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p27−30
−14.8%
31
+14.8%
Full HD35−40
−11.4%
39
+11.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how HD 6750 and ATI Mobility HD 5870 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5870 is 15% faster in 900p
  • ATI Mobility HD 5870 is 11% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.48 2.74
Recency 21 January 2011 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 50 Watt

HD 6750 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI Mobility HD 5870, on the other hand, has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, and 72% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6750 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 6750 Radeon HD 6750
vs
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Mobility Radeon HD 5870
vs
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
HD 6750 Radeon HD 6750
vs
ATI HD 4850 Radeon HD 4850
HD 6450 OEM AMD HD 6450 OEM
vs
GT 120M Mac Edition 120M Mac Edition
HD 6450 OEM AMD HD 6450 OEM
vs
GMA X4500MHD X4500MHD
HD 6450 OEM AMD HD 6450 OEM
vs
UHD Graphics 48EU 48EU
HD 6750 AMD HD 6750
vs
K1000M K1000M
HD 6750 AMD HD 6750
vs
HD 6310 6310
HD 6750 AMD HD 6750
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5430 5430
HD 6750 AMD HD 6750
vs
ATI X1900 GT X1900 GT
HD 6750 AMD HD 6750
vs
Go 6600 NPB 128M 6600 NPB 128M
HD 6750 AMD HD 6750
vs
Quadro CX CX
HD 6750 AMD HD 6750
vs
Plex 2200 D2 2200 D2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 300 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 71 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6750 or Mobility Radeon HD 5870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.