UHD Graphics P750 vs Radeon HD 6630M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6630M with UHD Graphics P750, including specs and performance data.

HD 6630M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 26 Watt
1.78

UHD Graphics P750 outperforms HD 6630M by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking924654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.7020.86
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameWhistlerRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480256
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0083.20
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6630M 1.78
UHD Graphics P750 4.56
+156%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6630M 684
UHD Graphics P750 1758
+157%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−135%
40−45
+135%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Hitman 3 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−143%
85−90
+143%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Hitman 3 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−143%
85−90
+143%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Hitman 3 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−143%
85−90
+143%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

This is how HD 6630M and UHD Graphics P750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics P750 is 135% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.78 4.56
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics P750 has a 156.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 73.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics P750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6630M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6630M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics P750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Radeon HD 6630M
Intel UHD Graphics P750
UHD Graphics P750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 44 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.