SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX vs Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | no data |
| GPU code name | no data | SISM672 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 February 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 January 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 560 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | 400 / 700 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 February 2012 | 1 January 2007 |
HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics has an age advantage of 5 years.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics and SIS Mirage 3+ 672MX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
