GeForce 315M vs Radeon HD 6570
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6570 with GeForce 315M, including specs and performance data.
HD 6570 outperforms 315M by a whopping 393% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1037 | 1382 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.07 | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.69 | 1.47 |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
GPU code name | Turks | GT218 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Design | reference | no data |
Release date | 19 April 2011 (14 years ago) | 5 January 2011 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 16 |
Core clock speed | no data | 606 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 716 million | 260 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 14 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 | 4.848 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.624 TFLOPS | 0.03878 TFLOPS |
Gigaflops | no data | 73 |
ROPs | 8 | 4 |
TMUs | 24 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | Up to 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
Multi monitor support | no data | + |
Eyefinity | + | - |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
DisplayPort support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
CrossFire | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
Power management | no data | 8.0 |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 11 | 11.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | - | N/A |
CUDA | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
God of War | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
God of War | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
God of War | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
God of War | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 29 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.33 | 0.27 |
Recency | 19 April 2011 | 5 January 2011 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 14 Watt |
HD 6570 has a 392.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.
GeForce 315M, on the other hand, has 185.7% lower power consumption.
The Radeon HD 6570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 315M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6570 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 315M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.