Tesla V100 FHHL vs Radeon HD 6520G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1143not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.52no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameSumoGV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2011 (12 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3205120
Core clock speed400 MHz937 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1290 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400412.8
Floating-point processing power0.256 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs16320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared810 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data829.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2011 27 March 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

HD 6520G has 614.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 FHHL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6520G and Tesla V100 FHHL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6520G is a desktop card while Tesla V100 FHHL is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Radeon HD 6520G
NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
Tesla V100 FHHL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 137 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6520G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 9 votes

Rate Tesla V100 FHHL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.