Radeon RX 5700 XT vs HD 6480G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6480G with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 6480G
2011
35 Watt
0.65

RX 5700 XT outperforms HD 6480G by a whopping 6334% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking119594
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.06
Power efficiency1.3013.05
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameSumoNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402560
Core clock speed444 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate5.328304.8
Floating-point processing power0.2131 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs12160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6480G 0.65
RX 5700 XT 41.82
+6334%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6480G 256
RX 5700 XT 16455
+6328%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6480G 467
RX 5700 XT 35823
+7571%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6480G 1578
RX 5700 XT 83961
+5221%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−6350%
129
+6350%
1440p1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
4K0−149

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.09
1440pno data5.12
4Kno data8.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−8650%
175
+8650%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1229%
93
+1229%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−6550%
133
+6550%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−986%
76
+986%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3775%
155
+3775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
177
+2113%
Valorant 27−30
−979%
313
+979%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−814%
64
+814%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1444%
270−280
+1444%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3650%
75
+3650%
Dota 2 12−14
−667%
92
+667%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3750%
154
+3750%
Metro Exodus 0−1 97
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1975%
166
+1975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3750%
154
+3750%
Valorant 27−30
−914%
294
+914%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−714%
57
+714%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3250%
67
+3250%
Dota 2 12−14
−758%
103
+758%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3600%
148
+3600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1638%
139
+1638%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2225%
93
+2225%
Valorant 27−30
−448%
159
+448%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 30−35
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−13500%
270−280
+13500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4275%
170−180
+4275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−11800%
119
+11800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−9200%
93
+9200%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 30−35
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−427%
79
+427%
Valorant 4−5
−5950%
242
+5950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2550%
53
+2550%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2150%
45
+2150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 223
+0%
223
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130
+0%
130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Fortnite 179
+0%
179
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 104
+0%
104
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 143
+0%
143
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 286
+0%
286
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+0%
72
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 37
+0%
37
+0%

This is how HD 6480G and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 6350% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 7700% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 13500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is ahead in 35 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 41.82
Recency 14 June 2011 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

HD 6480G has 542.9% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 6333.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6480G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6480G is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6480G
Radeon HD 6480G
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 138 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6480G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8396 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6480G or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.