GeForce 7800 GT vs Radeon HD 6470M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6470M with GeForce 7800 GT, including specs and performance data.
7800 GT outperforms HD 6470M by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1258 | 1244 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.01 |
Power efficiency | no data | 0.68 |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Curie (2003−2013) |
GPU code name | Seymour | G70 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 4 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 11 August 2005 (19 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $569.99 | $449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
HD 6470M and 7800 GT have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 160 | no data |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 400 MHz |
Number of transistors | 370 million | 302 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 65 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 5.600 | 8.000 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.224 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 4 | 16 |
TMUs | 8 | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 226 mm |
Width | no data | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 32 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 10
+0%
| 10−12
+0%
|
Full HD | 13
+8.3%
| 12−14
−8.3%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 43.85
−17.2%
| 37.42
+17.2%
|
- 7800 GT has 17% lower cost per frame in 1080p
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Valorant | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how HD 6470M and 7800 GT compete in popular games:
- A tie in 900p
- HD 6470M is 8% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.54 | 0.58 |
Recency | 4 January 2011 | 11 August 2005 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 110 nm |
HD 6470M has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.
7800 GT, on the other hand, has a 7.4% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 6470M and GeForce 7800 GT.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6470M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 7800 GT is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.