ATI Radeon E4690 vs HD 6450M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6450M with Radeon E4690, including specs and performance data.

HD 6450M
2011
1 GB DDR3
0.60

E4690 outperforms HD 6450M by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12641163
Place by popularity63not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.48
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameSeymourRV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (15 years ago)1 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160320
Core clock speed600 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors370 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate4.80019.20
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs832
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.0
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−50%
12−14
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Valorant 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Valorant 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Valorant 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how HD 6450M and ATI E4690 compete in popular games:

  • ATI E4690 is 50% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 0.97
Recency 4 January 2011 1 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm

HD 6450M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI E4690, on the other hand, has a 61.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon E4690 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6450M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon E4690 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6450M
Radeon HD 6450M
ATI Radeon E4690
Radeon E4690

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6450M or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.