Quadro4 400 NVS PCI vs GeForce 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1292not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.67no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameC89NV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2010 (15 years ago)16 July 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed450 MHz220 MHz
Number of transistors486 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2000.88 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82 ×2
TMUs164 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.312 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x LFH60

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)8.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2010 16 July 2004
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 18 Watt

GeForce 320M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, on the other hand, has 27.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 320M and Quadro4 400 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 67 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 320M or Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.