Radeon E9260 MXM vs HD 6450 GDDR5

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1114not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.48no data
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCaicosBaffin
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2011 (13 years ago)27 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160896
Core clock speed750 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data57.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.15 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2011 27 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 50 Watt

HD 6450 GDDR5 has 85.2% lower power consumption.

E9260 MXM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 and Radeon E9260 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is a desktop card while Radeon E9260 MXM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
Radeon E9260 MXM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 24 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon E9260 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.