Quadro P2200 vs Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.
P2200 outperforms HD 6450 GDDR5 by a whopping 2427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1184 | 281 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.53 | 22.98 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Caicos | GP106 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 April 2011 (14 years ago) | 10 June 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 160 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1493 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 119.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 40 |
| TMUs | no data | 80 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1280 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 201 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1251 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 200.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 7
−2329%
| 170−180
+2329%
|
| Full HD | 15
−2233%
| 350−400
+2233%
|
| 1200p | 5
−2300%
| 120−130
+2300%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−2400%
|
150−160
+2400%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2400%
|
200−210
+2400%
|
| Valorant | 30−33
−2400%
|
750−800
+2400%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 29
−2314%
|
700−750
+2314%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−2400%
|
350−400
+2400%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−2400%
|
150−160
+2400%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2400%
|
200−210
+2400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−2400%
|
150−160
+2400%
|
| Valorant | 30−33
−2400%
|
750−800
+2400%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−2400%
|
350−400
+2400%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−2400%
|
150−160
+2400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2400%
|
200−210
+2400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−2400%
|
150−160
+2400%
|
| Valorant | 30−33
−2400%
|
750−800
+2400%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−2400%
|
75−80
+2400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 5−6
−2300%
|
120−130
+2300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−2344%
|
220−230
+2344%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 3−4
−2400%
|
75−80
+2400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2400%
|
75−80
+2400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−2400%
|
350−400
+2400%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−2300%
|
120−130
+2300%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
This is how HD 6450 GDDR5 and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:
- Quadro P2200 is 2329% faster in 900p
- Quadro P2200 is 2233% faster in 1080p
- Quadro P2200 is 2300% faster in 1200p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.88 | 22.24 |
| Recency | 18 April 2011 | 10 June 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 5 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 75 Watt |
HD 6450 GDDR5 has 177.8% lower power consumption.
Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 2427.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
