GeForce GT 630 OEM vs Radeon HD 6380G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6380G with GeForce GT 630 OEM, including specs and performance data.

HD 6380G
2011, $400
35 Watt
0.47

630 OEM outperforms HD 6380G by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1296993
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.042.45
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameSuperSumoGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160192
Core clock speed400 MHz875 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20014.00
Floating-point processing power0.128 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Valorant 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Valorant 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Valorant 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Valorant 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 1.58
Recency 14 June 2011 24 April 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

HD 6380G has 42.9% lower power consumption.

GT 630 OEM, on the other hand, has a 236.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 630 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6380G in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6380G is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6380G
Radeon HD 6380G
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6380G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6380G or GeForce GT 630 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.