GeForce GT 630 OEM vs Radeon HD 6370M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6370M with GeForce GT 630 OEM, including specs and performance data.

HD 6370M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 11 Watt
0.62

630 OEM outperforms HD 6370M by a whopping 144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1228985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.542.43
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRobsonGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 November 2010 (14 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80192
Core clock speed750 MHz875 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate6.00014.00
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs816
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Valorant 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Valorant 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Valorant 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Valorant 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 1.51
Recency 26 November 2010 24 April 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 50 Watt

HD 6370M has 354.5% lower power consumption.

GT 630 OEM, on the other hand, has a 143.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 630 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6370M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6370M
Radeon HD 6370M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 162 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6370M or GeForce GT 630 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.