Quadro NVS 300M vs Radeon HD 6350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1277not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.30no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameParkG73
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 February 2011 (13 years ago)24 May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8013
Core clock speed650 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistors292 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt16 Watt
Texture fill rate5.2002.000
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2011 24 May 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 16 Watt

HD 6350 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 300M, on the other hand, has 18.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6350 and Quadro NVS 300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6350 is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 300M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6350
Radeon HD 6350
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M
Quadro NVS 300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 64 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.