Quadro NVS 300M vs Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1168not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.48no data
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameCaicosG73
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2011 (14 years ago)24 May 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16013
Core clock speed750 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data177 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt16 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.000
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2011 24 May 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 16 Watt

HD 6450 GDDR5 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 300M, on the other hand, has 68.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 and Quadro NVS 300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M
Quadro NVS 300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 or Quadro NVS 300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.