GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6350

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated861
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.01
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameParkGK107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 February 2011 (13 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80384
Core clock speed650 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors292 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate5.20034.72
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPS0.8333 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2011 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 50 Watt

HD 6350 has 163.2% lower power consumption.

GT 755M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6350 and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6350 is a desktop card while GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6350
Radeon HD 6350
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 64 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.