GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Radeon HD 6320

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6320 with GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

HD 6320
2011
18 Watt
0.38

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms HD 6320 by a whopping 23324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12786
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.48
Power efficiency1.4419.13
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLovelandAD103
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2011 (13 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$554.99 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

HD 6320 and RTX 4080 SUPER have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8010240
Core clock speed508 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors450 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate4.064816.0
Floating-point processing power0.08128 TFLOPS52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs8320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1438 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data736.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6320 0.38
RTX 4080 SUPER 89.01
+23324%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6320 147
RTX 4080 SUPER 34295
+23230%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 6320 302
RTX 4080 SUPER 87055
+28726%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6320 892
RTX 4080 SUPER 141652
+15789%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−25800%
259
+25800%
1440p0−1180
4K-0−1117

Cost per frame, $

1080p554.99
−14289%
3.86
+14289%
1440pno data5.55
4Kno data8.54
  • RTX 4080 SUPER has 14289% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−29900%
300
+29900%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−3414%
246
+3414%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−24800%
249
+24800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−27900%
280
+27900%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−3329%
240
+3329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−24500%
246
+24500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−11367%
344
+11367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
170−180
+2429%
Valorant 27−30
−1911%
500−550
+1911%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−21600%
217
+21600%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2957%
214
+2957%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1886%
270−280
+1886%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−23700%
238
+23700%
Dota 2 10−11
−22900%
2300−2350
+22900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−11300%
342
+11300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
170−180
+2429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−13575%
547
+13575%
Valorant 27−30
−1911%
500−550
+1911%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2614%
190
+2614%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−19800%
199
+19800%
Dota 2 10−11
−22900%
2300−2350
+22900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−10633%
322
+10633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
170−180
+2429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−6475%
263
+6475%
Valorant 27−30
−1911%
500−550
+1911%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8000%
160−170
+8000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 128
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−30500%
306
+30500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−22000%
221
+22000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 150−160

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 85−90
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1147%
187
+1147%
Valorant 2−3
−16500%
300−350
+16500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−14400%
145
+14400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 240
+0%
240
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 308
+0%
308
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 227
+0%
227
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 285
+0%
285
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 179
+0%
179
+0%
Metro Exodus 227
+0%
227
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 212
+0%
212
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 169
+0%
169
+0%
Metro Exodus 162
+0%
162
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 208
+0%
208
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+0%
204
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 305
+0%
305
+0%

This is how HD 6320 and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 25800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 SUPER is 30500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is ahead in 31 test (53%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 89.01
Recency 15 August 2011 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 320 Watt

HD 6320 has 1677.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 23323.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6320 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6320 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6320
Radeon HD 6320
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 198 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2480 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6320 or GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.