NVS 5100M vs HD Graphics 500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 500 with NVS 5100M, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 500
2015
8 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 10 Watt
0.76
+49%

HD Graphics 500 outperforms NVS 5100M by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11621240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.901.02
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1GT216
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9648
Core clock speed200 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate7.8008.800
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS0.1162 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 500 0.76
+49%
NVS 5100M 0.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 500 299
+50.3%
NVS 5100M 199

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
1440p10−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Valorant 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how HD Graphics 500 and NVS 5100M compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 500 is 67% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 0.51
Recency 1 September 2015 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

HD Graphics 500 has a 49% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 500 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 500 is a notebook graphics card while NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 500
NVIDIA NVS 5100M
NVS 5100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 732 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 36 votes

Rate NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 500 or NVS 5100M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.