FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5850 with FirePro V3900, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5850
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 151 Watt
4.99
+210%

ATI HD 5850 outperforms V3900 by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking630953
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.63no data
Power efficiency2.362.30
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameCypressTurks
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 September 2009 (15 years ago)7 February 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1440480
Core clock speed725 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)151 Watt199 Watt
Texture fill rate52.2015.60
Floating-point processing power2.088 TFLOPS0.624 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs7224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datahalf height / half length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5850 4.99
+210%
FirePro V3900 1.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5850 1988
+211%
FirePro V3900 640

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p59
+228%
18−20
−228%
Full HD55
+244%
16−18
−244%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Dota 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Fortnite 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
World of Tanks 80−85
+211%
27−30
−211%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Dota 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Dota 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
World of Tanks 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Valorant 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Valorant 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

This is how ATI HD 5850 and FirePro V3900 compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5850 is 228% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5850 is 244% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.99 1.61
Recency 30 September 2009 7 February 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 199 Watt

ATI HD 5850 has a 209.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 31.8% lower power consumption.

FirePro V3900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The Radeon HD 5850 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5850 is a desktop card while FirePro V3900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5850
Radeon HD 5850
AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 257 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 96 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.