Radeon R7 M440 vs HD 5770

Place in performance ranking	627	810
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.68	0.09
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Juniper	Meso
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	13 October 2009 (14 years ago)	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	no data
Current price	$103 (0.6x MSRP)	$737

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI HD 5770 has 656% better value for money than R7 M440.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	320
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1021 MHz
Number of transistors	1,040 million	1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	34.00	17.82
Floating-point performance	1,360.0 gflops	653.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 5770 and Radeon R7 M440 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	208 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5770 4.41
+88.5%

R7 M440 2.34

HD 5770 outperforms R7 M440 by 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5770 1705
+88.4%

R7 M440 905

HD 5770 outperforms R7 M440 by 88% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5770 2410
+7.3%

R7 M440 2245

HD 5770 outperforms R7 M440 by 7% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5770 11699
+110%

R7 M440 5584

HD 5770 outperforms R7 M440 by 110% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	24 +100%	12−14 −100%
Full HD	46 +188%	16 −188%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	10−12	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	no data
Far Cry 5	9−10	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14	no data
Forza Horizon 4	20−22	no data
Hitman 3	8−9	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27	no data
Metro Exodus	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	10−12	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	no data
Far Cry 5	9−10	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14	no data
Forza Horizon 4	20−22	no data
Hitman 3	8−9	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27	no data
Metro Exodus	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9	no data
Far Cry 5	9−10	no data
Forza Horizon 4	20−22	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	no data
Far Cry 5	7−8	no data
Forza Horizon 4	7−8	no data
Hitman 3	9−10	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11	no data
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4	no data
Hitman 3	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	no data
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5	no data
Metro Exodus	6−7	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	no data