Radeon HD 6450 vs ATI HD 5770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5770 and Radeon HD 6450, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 5770
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
3.86
+758%

HD 5770 outperforms HD 6450 by a whopping 758% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7171288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.74no data
Power efficiency2.882.01
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameJuniperCaicos
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date13 October 2009 (15 years ago)7 April 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 $55

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

ATI HD 5770 and HD 6450 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800160
Core clock speed850 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate34.005.000
Floating-point processing power1.36 TFLOPS0.2 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs408
L1 Cache80 KB16 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.0 x8
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length208 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5)

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data4
HDMI++
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)DirectX® 11
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 5770 3.86
+758%
HD 6450 0.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5770 1705
+761%
Samples: 7710
HD 6450 198
Samples: 4778

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Full HD50
+900%
5−6
−900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.18
+246%
11.00
−246%
  • ATI HD 5770 has 246% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Fortnite 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Valorant 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+813%
8−9
−813%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Dota 2 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Fortnite 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Valorant 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Dota 2 35−40
+825%
4−5
−825%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Valorant 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
Valorant 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Valorant 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

This is how ATI HD 5770 and HD 6450 compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5770 is 1100% faster in 900p
  • ATI HD 5770 is 900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.86 0.45
Recency 13 October 2009 7 April 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 30 Watt

ATI HD 5770 has a 757.8% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 6450, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 260% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5770
Radeon HD 5770
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Radeon HD 6450

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 722 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 571 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5770 or Radeon HD 6450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.