HD Graphics 400 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Place in the ranking	668	1082
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.90	no data
Power efficiency	2.83	12.98
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	Juniper	Braswell GT1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	13 October 2009 (15 years ago)	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	96
Core clock speed	850 MHz	320 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	600 MHz
Number of transistors	1,040 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	6 Watt
Texture fill rate	34.00	7.200
Floating-point processing power	1.36 TFLOPS	0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	2
TMUs	40	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	Ring Bus
Length	208 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.3
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	24 +300%	6−7 −300%
Full HD	49 +308%	12−14 −308%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

3.24

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Elden Ring	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Valorant	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Dota 2	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Elden Ring	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Fortnite	24−27 +333%	6−7 −333%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +322%	9−10 −322%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Valorant	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
World of Tanks	70−75 +311%	18−20 −311%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Dota 2	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +322%	9−10 −322%
Valorant	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Elden Ring	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4	0−1
World of Tanks	30−35 +300%	8−9 −300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +300%	8−9 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Valorant	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Elden Ring	2−3	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Fortnite	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4	0−1
Valorant	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

This is how ATI HD 5770 and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

ATI HD 5770 is 300% faster in 900p
ATI HD 5770 is 308% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.44	1.13
Recency	13 October 2009	1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	6 Watt

ATI HD 5770 has a 292.9% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1700% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5770 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5770 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 400 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.