Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6750 6770 6770 Green Edition 5670 640SP Edition 5750 5770 5770 Mac Edition 5770 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Qualcomm Adreno 685

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5750 with Qualcomm Adreno 685, including specs and performance data.

ATI HD 5750
2009
1 GB GDDR5, 86 Watt
2.76
+31.4%

HD 5750 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 685 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI HD 5750 HD 5750
Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 685

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking834916
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.5023.35
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameJuniperno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 October 2009 (16 years ago)6 December 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores720no data
Core clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,040 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate25.20no data
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs36no data
L1 Cache72 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length178 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1150 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI HD 5750 2.76
+31.4%
Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5750 1169
+31.5%
Samples: 2464
Qualcomm Adreno 685 889
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.76 2.10
Recency 13 October 2009 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 7 Watt

ATI HD 5750 has a 31.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm Adreno 685, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1128.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 5750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5750 is a desktop graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI HD 5750 Radeon HD 5750
vs
GT 640 GeForce GT 640
Qualcomm Adreno 685 Adreno 685
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 680 Adreno 680
ATI HD 5750 Radeon HD 5750
vs
HD 7730 Radeon HD 7730
ATI HD 4520 HD 4520
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 GDDR6
ATI HD 4570 Rebrand HD 4570 Rebrand
vs
RX 5700M RX 5700M
ATI HD 4570 Rebrand HD 4570 Rebrand
vs
GTX 1650 TU116 GTX 1650 TU116
ATI HD 5970 HD 5970
vs
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
ATI HD 5750 HD 5750
vs
HD 6670A HD 6670A
ATI HD 5750 HD 5750
vs
GT 720 OEM GT 720 OEM
ATI HD 3610 HD 3610
vs
Jetson TX1 GPU Jetson TX1 GPU
ATI HD 5870 HD 5870
vs
HD 8790M HD 8790M
ATI HD 5870 HD 5870
vs
GTX 470 X2 GTX 470 X2
ATI HD 5870 HD 5870
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q RTX 5000 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 308 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 17 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5750 or Qualcomm Adreno 685, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.