Radeon RX 7700 XT vs ATI HD 5670

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 5670 and Radeon RX 7700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI HD 5670
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 64 Watt
2.09

RX 7700 XT outperforms ATI HD 5670 by a whopping 2699% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking87839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2670.43
Power efficiency2.2516.47
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRedwoodNavi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 January 2010 (15 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 26988% better value for money than ATI HD 5670.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4003456
Core clock speed775 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2544 MHz
Number of transistors627 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate15.50549.5
Floating-point processing power0.62 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5670 2.09
RX 7700 XT 58.50
+2699%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5670 802
RX 7700 XT 22493
+2705%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

ATI HD 5670 1468
RX 7700 XT 57340
+3806%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI HD 5670 6584
RX 7700 XT 126733
+1825%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p26
−2592%
700−750
+2592%
Full HD32
−488%
188
+488%
1440p3−4
−3333%
103
+3333%
4K2−3
−2900%
60
+2900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.72
−55.7%
2.39
+55.7%
1440p39.67
−810%
4.36
+810%
4K59.50
−695%
7.48
+695%
  • RX 7700 XT has 56% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT has 810% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT has 695% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1660%
176
+1660%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−3760%
193
+3760%
Elden Ring 3−4
−6300%
192
+6300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2825%
110−120
+2825%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1350%
145
+1350%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1480%
79
+1480%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−3518%
398
+3518%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−7750%
157
+7750%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1238%
100−110
+1238%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2825%
110−120
+2825%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1110%
121
+1110%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1220%
66
+1220%
Dota 2 4−5
−4050%
166
+4050%
Elden Ring 3−4
−7200%
210−220
+7200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−669%
100
+669%
Fortnite 10−12
−1991%
230−240
+1991%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−2936%
334
+2936%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−4050%
166
+4050%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−6500%
132
+6500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−975%
210−220
+975%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1238%
100−110
+1238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1833%
170−180
+1833%
World of Tanks 40−45
−598%
270−280
+598%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2825%
110−120
+2825%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1000%
110
+1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1120%
61
+1120%
Dota 2 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−800%
110−120
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−2509%
287
+2509%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−975%
210−220
+975%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
−14000%
140−150
+14000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1150%
170−180
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−6600%
65−70
+6600%
World of Tanks 12−14
−2854%
350−400
+2854%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 85−90
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−711%
73
+711%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40
+1233%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−2567%
160−170
+2567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3900%
120
+3900%
Valorant 8−9
−2725%
220−230
+2725%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−600%
112
+600%
Elden Ring 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−647%
112
+647%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−3350%
200−210
+3350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−647%
112
+647%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%
Dota 2 16−18
−2400%
400−450
+2400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5150%
100−110
+5150%
Fortnite 0−1 95−100
Valorant 2−3
−6250%
120−130
+6250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 193
+0%
193
+0%
Metro Exodus 134
+0%
134
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+0%
97
+0%

This is how ATI HD 5670 and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 2592% faster in 900p
  • RX 7700 XT is 488% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 3333% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 2900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 14000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is ahead in 48 tests (81%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (19%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 58.50
Recency 14 January 2010 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 245 Watt

ATI HD 5670 has 282.8% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 2699% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5670
Radeon HD 5670
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 452 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1677 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.