FirePro W2100 vs Radeon HD 5670

Place in performance ranking	829	809
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.10	0.39
Architecture	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	Redwood	Mars
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	14 January 2010 (14 years ago)	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119	no data
Current price	$132 (1.1x MSRP)	$123

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W2100 has 290% better value for money than ATI HD 5670.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	320
Core clock speed	775 MHz	680 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	680 MHz
Number of transistors	627 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	26 Watt
Texture fill rate	15.50	13.60
Floating-point performance	620.0 gflops	435.2 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Form factor	no data	low profile / half length
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	2x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data
DisplayPort count	no data	2
Dual-link DVI support	no data	1

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5670 2.07

FirePro W2100 2.33
+12.6%

FirePro W2100 outperforms Radeon HD 5670 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

ATI HD 5670 801

FirePro W2100 903
+12.7%

FirePro W2100 outperforms Radeon HD 5670 by 13% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	26 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Full HD	32 +167%	12 −167%
4K	1−2 −100%	2 +100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

+0%

5−6

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

This is how ATI HD 5670 and FirePro W2100 compete in popular games:

FirePro W2100 is 3.8% faster than ATI HD 5670 in 900p
ATI HD 5670 is 167% faster than FirePro W2100 in 1080p
FirePro W2100 is 100% faster than ATI HD 5670 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the FirePro W2100 is 100% faster than the ATI HD 5670.

All in all, in popular games:

FirePro W2100 is ahead in 19 tests (40%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (60%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	2.07	2.33
Recency	14 January 2010	2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	64 Watt	26 Watt