Video Xpression+ vs Radeon HD 4890

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking664not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.65no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameRV790Mach64
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 April 2009 (15 years ago)1 May 1996 (28 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data
Current price$11.97 (0x MSRP)$118

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed850 MHz62 MHz
Number of transistors959 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Wattno data
Texture fill rate34.00no data
Floating-point performance1,360.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5EDO
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3900 MHz62 MHz
Memory bandwidth124.8 GB/s496.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)N/A
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2009 1 May 1996
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 600 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4890 and Video Xpression+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4890
Radeon HD 4890
ATI Video Xpression+
Video Xpression+

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4890 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.